There is no composer who more desperately needs more recordings than GF Haas tbh.

I agree, quite a large chunk is only available on YouTube through private festival recordings. Due to this, I don't have any physical CDs of Haas' work 

There is no composer who more desperately needs more recordings than GF Haas tbh.

Eddie, in all honesty, I think you need to practice a little more before you post any music.

Symphony in Three Movements, I think is one of his best works. There is something really elusive about it to me, as well as flashbacks to Le Sacre 

As a scholar of the sciences, it is very difficult for me to not associate music with numerical patterns. Whether it's Bach, Mozart, Schoenberg, Stockhausen, Cage, Xenakis, or Haas... I cannot escape the inherent mathematical construction of each and every one of them.

Of course, that's a well-known fact. The Greeks included music as part of the Quadrivium, along with geometry, arithmetic, and astronomy.

All modern musical thought, serial or not, shares underlying principles of symmetry and numerical division of the octave; this is just a part of musical thinking, and should not be seen as a separate mathematical way of thinking.

John Coltrane studied Slonimsky's Thesaurus of Scales, and his "Giant Steps" embodies principles of symmetry and octave division, and numbers.

Music is itself a "geometry of sound," and when we accept this as axiomatic, we can enter a fascinating world of discovery.

Of course, when composing or playing, there is a time to just "wing it" and go by intuition; but this should not be seen as in opposition to logic and learning.

I don't think that the division between music and mathematical logic is a real one; I think it's just a lazy way of justifying some kind of creative license.